I can't imagine not disclosing this to the judge... that is some crazy, bold move! Plaintiff's counsel's failure to disclose his marriage to plaintiff's expert witness did not constitute grounds for new trial; only possible use of evidence was for impeachment purposes, and there is apparently no obligation for attorney to disclose information which can solely be used for impeachment purposes. May v. Strecker, 453 N.W.2d 549 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990)

I can't imagine not disclosing this to the judge... that is some crazy, bold move! Plaintiff's counsel's failure to disclose his marriage to plaintiff's expert witness did not constitute grounds for new trial; only possible use of evidence was for impeachment purposes, and there is apparently no obligation for attorney to disclose information which can solely be used for impeachment purposes. May v. Strecker, 453 N.W.2d 549 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990)

by Christian T. Misner



July 10, 2014 at 06:44PM

from Facebook

via IFTTTfrom Facebook

via IFTTT